Sadly this wasn't one of my best times in the darkroom. Well the problems started outside of the darkroom. My camera started acting wierd with the battery, it would say I had no more battery when two seconds ago I did! And even when I put a bran new battery it would tell me it was empty. So, Ms.Dele took it to take a look at it and lend me this pretty old camera that I really don't like. It is very hard to focus with it, there is no zoom and it doesn't exactly tell you when you have no more film left. Then the timer of my enlarger got changed, that wasn't too bad but I have to admit I was a bit fustrated. After that I had to change enlarger because a new enlarger got brought in and put in the place where my original enlarger stood.
The new enlarger I moved to was the same type as my old one but the bulb wasn't as strong and it didn't have the numbers on the aperture to see, so then we had to change that. My prints gave my headaches, I think it was because it was so hard to focus with this camera I'm using now that a lot of my pictures came out blurry and they also came out grainy, very very grainy. I was baffeled by the fact that we needed 9 prints but I guess its a live and learn situation and hopefully I will soon have my camera back.
Theory Notes (Shooting in low and sun light):
Low light:
- When shooting landscape or portrait use tripod, it will allow for better results when using a longer shutter speed.
- Necessary to raise ISO speed.
- Simply try to lean against something sturdy.
- For more info click here.
Sun Light:
1) Low light
Here are examples of which shutter speeds and apertures to use when shooting with low light.
2)Sunlight
There kids here were photographed with the sun way up high causing shadows underneath their eyes, and some squinting.
Here the sun is on the side of the subjects face and the late sun gives warmer colours.
Printing Compositions:
Contact sheet:
Ap:4
Time:15
Filter: -
Clothing #1:
Test strips:
Ap: 4
Time:
15
17
19
21
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap: 4
Time:23
F:-
I think this picture is alright. Not my favourite. I would have liked it more if maybe I would have angeled myself more to be facing more directly at him
Clothing #2:
Test strips:
I don't have any test strips for this one because I was really hurring to do this print and I did it mostly by eye.
Print with problem:
Ap: 4
Time: 30
Filter:-
Since I was doing this by eye this print turned out too dark. Also I was starting to loose the white of the wall and her face was too dark. It's a bit hard to see electronically. Since I was loosing my whites I close my aperture.
Final print:
Ap:5.6
Time:33
Filter:-
When one compares this print to the previous one, you can see the difference of the white tiles. I'm pretty proud that I was able to figure it out, cause usually I'm not confident enough to change the aperture myself but I had to do that with many other prints so I sort of learned.
Clothing #3:
Unfortunatly, I ran out of time and I wasn't able to produce a third clothes shot.
Shoes #1:
Test strips:
Ap:4
Filter:-
21 19 17 15
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap:4
Time:25
Filter:-
This is one of the few prints of this part of the project that I actually like. It's not grainy and the whites are just right. I really like how there are other random shoes in the background but how the focus is set on Fabrizio's shoe.
Shoes #2:
Test strips:
Ap:5.6
Filter:-
35 30 25 20
Ap:4
Filter:-
40 35 30 25 20
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap: 4
Time:45
Filter:-
I like how this picture turned out. I think it could have been that the developer was changed and it was stronger there for it was quicker and darker. Some people had this same shot but to make it a bit different what I did was I cropped most of Shani's face out thus changing the picture from others and also focusing more on the shoes.
Shoes #3:
Test strips:
I sadly lost all the test strip for this print but usually my test strips where aperture 4 and starting at 15 seconds going up by 2s.
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap:4
Time:23
I like how this picture is taken in motion. This picture wasn't as grainy as the ones that I tried to develope after this. It's not my favourite picture, seems a bit bland.
Accessories #1:
Test strips:
Ap: 4
Filter:-
28 26 24 22 20
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap:4
Time:27
Filter:-
I like the contrast of this pictyre and how I didn't fully crop the models face off but left a little bit of it. I think the lighting worked out pretty nicely, it might be because of her shirt but it makes it seem as if the light is concentrated on her shirt/scarf area.
Accessories #2:
Test strips:
Ap:8
Filter:-
4
6
8
Print with problem:
I had a couple prints with problems but once again they were no where to be seen. What was wrong with the picture was that it was grainy and I was loosing the whites. This is when all my pictures started being grainy.
Final print:
Ap:8
Time:12
Filter: 2.5
I actually like this print. I think the usage of the light is very good but looking at it now I would have liked to have the light a bit more upwards because it seems as if it gets cut off to close the actual accessories.
Accessories #3:
Test strips:
I sadly lost all the test strip for this print but usually my test strips where aperture 4 and starting at 15 seconds going up by 2s.
Print with problem:
I had a couple prints with problems but once again they were no where to be seen. But basically it was really grainy and just needed more time.
Final print:
Ap: 5.6
Time:30
Filter:-
This was another print in which I had to change the aperture because I was loosing the whites. This picture was a full lenght picture but to focus more on the accessories I cropped it so only half of her body was showing.
Image Bank:
Fashion:
I really like the angle of this picture and how the photographer was able to use the sunlight (or what seems to be sunlight) to creat a halo on the left side of the model and it gives it a warmer touch.
This picture was taken by Jason Christopher. He is a fashion photographer based in Los Angeles California. He first started with photography at the age of 14 when he had saved up money to buy his own camera. He later assisted a celebrity photographer called Jerry Avenaim.
Further info click here .
What I really like about this picutre is the contrast between her jacket and everything else in the picture. Everything else isr ather white or gray but her dark jackey really stands out making her the main focus of the picture.
This photograph was taken by Trevor Brady based in Vancouver, Canada.
Further info click here.
To be completley honest I chose this picture mainly because of the colours and the movement in it. I like how there is this light behind her and also even though this picture is in colour, the tourquoise is a nice contrast against the bland background making her stand out.
The photographer of this picture is Richard Reinsdorf. He is a photographer also based in L.A that takes pictures for leading advertising campaings and magazines.
Further info click here.
Shoes:
I find this picture very comedic. I don't know if it totally 100% is advertising shoes, but I think it depends in the way that one looks at it and I think it adds a very interesting wist than just two feet, just there with shoes on. The one thing that I noticed of the lighting is how in the bottom right hand corner there seems to be more concentrated light and as one goes diagonally up it gets darker.
This picture was taken by Stephane Bourson, a French photographer located in Paris. I couldn't find too much information but I did find that he specializes in photographin women.
Further info click here.
Since most colours in this picture are around the pinkish tone, the right blue shoes really stand out.
Also the model isn't exactly trying to show off her clothes and seems to be putting the shoes in display for easy viewing. There really isn't a very specific lighting type here, it all seems to be pretty even.
This picture was taken my Javier Vallhonrat, a Spanish photographer from Madrid. He has contributed with his picutres on magazines such as; French Vogue, Italian Vogue, Japanese Vogue, Mixte, Big and others.
Further info click here.
There are a couple things to make it clear that this is a picture for the shoes (and the handbag). One because the model isnt wearing anything but the shoes and the handbag. Another thing is that it is an advertisment for Jimmy Choo which does shoes and hangbags. I really like the colour scheme though I'm not too sure if that colour is appreciated in this picture because of the sort of gloomy lighting there is.
This picture was taken by David Slijper, a photographer based in London. He is very diverse with the fashion photography he can acquire.
Further info click here.
Accessories:
I really like the whole idea of this picture. The bare back with that single necklace. The curves of the body are very nice and make this picture very sensual. Regarding the lighting I noticed that on the extremities (mostly the shoulders) there is some hard light, if not some reflection of something but towards the center there is no specific lighting.
This picture was taken by Michael David Adams, who is a photographer based in New York City. He does a lot of portraits, fashion and beautiy shots. He started off by painting and his love of art later on developed into him choosing photography as his way to show his art.
Further info click here.
I think there is a lot of different accessories in this picture. You have the pretty big necklace, the earings and the pretty extravagant head piece. It's a nice simple looking photograph clearly advertising the necklace. I think it was a smart idea to match the lipstick of the model to the colours of the accessories there for attention wouldn't be taken away from the objects being advertised. I do like the shadow on her left side, it deffently gives her a sharper look.
This picture was taken by Victor de Mello. He is a Portuguese photographer based in London. He pays a lot of attention to the shapes within beauty. He is very influenced by the whole Latin culture.
Further info click here.
Again for this picture I find the idea very interesting, the having more than one watch and braclette on at once. Also the fact that the model isn't wearing anythin but the accessories draws the eyes to the hand on her head. There's some nice hard lighting in parts of her body, mostly the inside part, that really gives her an edge.
This was taken my Salvador Pozo, he is a photographer based in Ridderkerk, The Netherlands. He specifices in bridal & evening fashion, jewelry & wathes, make-up and beauty, editorial & commercial.
Further info click here.
- Try to shoot when the sun is low in the sky. When the sun is up high it causes shadows on the peoples eyes or makes the people squint.
- Try to make the sunlight hit the model from the side.
- For more info click here.
1) Low light
Here are examples of which shutter speeds and apertures to use when shooting with low light.2)Sunlight
There kids here were photographed with the sun way up high causing shadows underneath their eyes, and some squinting.
Here the sun is on the side of the subjects face and the late sun gives warmer colours.
Printing Compositions:
Contact sheet:
Ap:4Time:15
Filter: -
Clothing #1:
Test strips:
Ap: 4Time:
15
17
19
21
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap: 4
Time:23
F:-
I think this picture is alright. Not my favourite. I would have liked it more if maybe I would have angeled myself more to be facing more directly at him
Clothing #2:
Test strips:
I don't have any test strips for this one because I was really hurring to do this print and I did it mostly by eye.
Print with problem:
Ap: 4Time: 30
Filter:-
Since I was doing this by eye this print turned out too dark. Also I was starting to loose the white of the wall and her face was too dark. It's a bit hard to see electronically. Since I was loosing my whites I close my aperture.
Final print:
Ap:5.6Time:33
Filter:-
When one compares this print to the previous one, you can see the difference of the white tiles. I'm pretty proud that I was able to figure it out, cause usually I'm not confident enough to change the aperture myself but I had to do that with many other prints so I sort of learned.
Clothing #3:
Unfortunatly, I ran out of time and I wasn't able to produce a third clothes shot.
Shoes #1:
Test strips:
Ap:4Filter:-
21 19 17 15
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap:4Time:25
Filter:-
This is one of the few prints of this part of the project that I actually like. It's not grainy and the whites are just right. I really like how there are other random shoes in the background but how the focus is set on Fabrizio's shoe.
Shoes #2:
Test strips:
Ap:5.6Filter:-
35 30 25 20
Ap:4Filter:-
40 35 30 25 20
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap: 4Time:45
Filter:-
I like how this picture turned out. I think it could have been that the developer was changed and it was stronger there for it was quicker and darker. Some people had this same shot but to make it a bit different what I did was I cropped most of Shani's face out thus changing the picture from others and also focusing more on the shoes.
Shoes #3:
Test strips:
I sadly lost all the test strip for this print but usually my test strips where aperture 4 and starting at 15 seconds going up by 2s.
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap:4
Time:23
I like how this picture is taken in motion. This picture wasn't as grainy as the ones that I tried to develope after this. It's not my favourite picture, seems a bit bland.
Accessories #1:
Test strips:
Ap: 4Filter:-
28 26 24 22 20
Print with problem:
I didn't have a copy that was bad of this print.
Final print:
Ap:4
Time:27
Filter:-
I like the contrast of this pictyre and how I didn't fully crop the models face off but left a little bit of it. I think the lighting worked out pretty nicely, it might be because of her shirt but it makes it seem as if the light is concentrated on her shirt/scarf area.
Accessories #2:
Test strips:
Ap:8Filter:-
4
6
8
Print with problem:
I had a couple prints with problems but once again they were no where to be seen. What was wrong with the picture was that it was grainy and I was loosing the whites. This is when all my pictures started being grainy.
Final print:
Ap:8
Time:12
Filter: 2.5
I actually like this print. I think the usage of the light is very good but looking at it now I would have liked to have the light a bit more upwards because it seems as if it gets cut off to close the actual accessories.
Accessories #3:
Test strips:
I sadly lost all the test strip for this print but usually my test strips where aperture 4 and starting at 15 seconds going up by 2s.
Print with problem:
I had a couple prints with problems but once again they were no where to be seen. But basically it was really grainy and just needed more time.
Final print:
Ap: 5.6
Time:30
Filter:-
This was another print in which I had to change the aperture because I was loosing the whites. This picture was a full lenght picture but to focus more on the accessories I cropped it so only half of her body was showing.
Image Bank:
Fashion:
I really like the angle of this picture and how the photographer was able to use the sunlight (or what seems to be sunlight) to creat a halo on the left side of the model and it gives it a warmer touch.This picture was taken by Jason Christopher. He is a fashion photographer based in Los Angeles California. He first started with photography at the age of 14 when he had saved up money to buy his own camera. He later assisted a celebrity photographer called Jerry Avenaim.
Further info click here .
What I really like about this picutre is the contrast between her jacket and everything else in the picture. Everything else isr ather white or gray but her dark jackey really stands out making her the main focus of the picture.This photograph was taken by Trevor Brady based in Vancouver, Canada.
Further info click here.
To be completley honest I chose this picture mainly because of the colours and the movement in it. I like how there is this light behind her and also even though this picture is in colour, the tourquoise is a nice contrast against the bland background making her stand out.
The photographer of this picture is Richard Reinsdorf. He is a photographer also based in L.A that takes pictures for leading advertising campaings and magazines.
Further info click here.
Shoes:
I find this picture very comedic. I don't know if it totally 100% is advertising shoes, but I think it depends in the way that one looks at it and I think it adds a very interesting wist than just two feet, just there with shoes on. The one thing that I noticed of the lighting is how in the bottom right hand corner there seems to be more concentrated light and as one goes diagonally up it gets darker.This picture was taken by Stephane Bourson, a French photographer located in Paris. I couldn't find too much information but I did find that he specializes in photographin women.
Further info click here.
Since most colours in this picture are around the pinkish tone, the right blue shoes really stand out. Also the model isn't exactly trying to show off her clothes and seems to be putting the shoes in display for easy viewing. There really isn't a very specific lighting type here, it all seems to be pretty even.
This picture was taken my Javier Vallhonrat, a Spanish photographer from Madrid. He has contributed with his picutres on magazines such as; French Vogue, Italian Vogue, Japanese Vogue, Mixte, Big and others.
Further info click here.
There are a couple things to make it clear that this is a picture for the shoes (and the handbag). One because the model isnt wearing anything but the shoes and the handbag. Another thing is that it is an advertisment for Jimmy Choo which does shoes and hangbags. I really like the colour scheme though I'm not too sure if that colour is appreciated in this picture because of the sort of gloomy lighting there is.This picture was taken by David Slijper, a photographer based in London. He is very diverse with the fashion photography he can acquire.
Further info click here.
Accessories:
I really like the whole idea of this picture. The bare back with that single necklace. The curves of the body are very nice and make this picture very sensual. Regarding the lighting I noticed that on the extremities (mostly the shoulders) there is some hard light, if not some reflection of something but towards the center there is no specific lighting.This picture was taken by Michael David Adams, who is a photographer based in New York City. He does a lot of portraits, fashion and beautiy shots. He started off by painting and his love of art later on developed into him choosing photography as his way to show his art.
Further info click here.
I think there is a lot of different accessories in this picture. You have the pretty big necklace, the earings and the pretty extravagant head piece. It's a nice simple looking photograph clearly advertising the necklace. I think it was a smart idea to match the lipstick of the model to the colours of the accessories there for attention wouldn't be taken away from the objects being advertised. I do like the shadow on her left side, it deffently gives her a sharper look.This picture was taken by Victor de Mello. He is a Portuguese photographer based in London. He pays a lot of attention to the shapes within beauty. He is very influenced by the whole Latin culture.
Further info click here.
Again for this picture I find the idea very interesting, the having more than one watch and braclette on at once. Also the fact that the model isn't wearing anythin but the accessories draws the eyes to the hand on her head. There's some nice hard lighting in parts of her body, mostly the inside part, that really gives her an edge.
This was taken my Salvador Pozo, he is a photographer based in Ridderkerk, The Netherlands. He specifices in bridal & evening fashion, jewelry & wathes, make-up and beauty, editorial & commercial.
Further info click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment